Nursing homes strengths and weaknesses, risk assessment, diagnoses, detailed care plan, one intervention and evaluation

Question description

Week 10 Project – Submit Files

CAPSTONE PROJECTEvaluation of Plan Effectiveness CriteriaYou spent the last two weeks implementing a portion of the comprehensive care plan you developed for the aggregate. An evaluation of plan effectiveness is now due.In the evaluation component of the Capstone project, you are expected to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention.Some questions you should seek answers to are:What barriers might you anticipate when implementing the intervention as planned?What visible signs of success would you look for (for example, reduced health issues)? Describe them.The evaluation component of the final paper should describe your evaluation of the implementation. Include responses to points 1and 2 above. The evaluation component of the final Microsoft Word submission document should be a minimum of 2 pages.The complete summary document should use the Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track (MAP-IT) steps used in pulling together your project.Over the past nine weeks, you selected an aggregate and conducted a risk assessment of its health, developed a care plan to address those health risks, planned an implement one intervention in a small group from the aggregate, and considered the effectiveness of the intervention on the health of the small group. It’s time now for you to present your final submission of this Capstone project.Your final submission comprises the documentation of the work accomplished through your Capstone project, a Microsoft Word Document that contains the evaluation and summary, a Microsoft PowerPoint presentation highlighting the main aspects of the project including the key things learned during the 10 weeks of working with this project.The summary document should use the Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track (MAP-IT) steps used in pulling together your project. The complete documentation of the work accomplished over the course of the project should contain a minimum of 6–7 pages in a Microsoft Word document and should include the following information:A detailed description of the aggregateA description of the aggregate’s strengths and weaknessesA risk assessment of the aggregateDiagnoses based on the risk assessmentA detailed care plan for the aggregateA description of how at least one intervention was implemented in the aggregate to address an identified issueAn evaluation of how you would identify the effectiveness of the interventionThe Power Point presentation should be concise and should include the highlights of the Capstone project and the key things learned over the course of this project, from developing, implementing, and evaluating the care plan. Your presentation should not exceed 15 slides.Submit your final Microsoft Word document containing the evaluation and complete summary to the W10 Assignment 2 Dropbox by Sunday, March 11, 1900. Use bold sub-headings in the paper to differentiate between the evaluation and the summary information. Submit your activities log to Doc Sharing.PHASE 7 AND 8: FINAL SUBMISSION

Rubric Name: NSG4075 Week 10 Project Rubric

CriteriaNO SUBMISSION
0 POINTSEMERGING (F THROUGH D RANGE) (12-14)
14 POINTSSATISFACTORY (C RANGE) (14-16)
16 POINTSPROFICIENT (B RANGE) (16-18)
18 POINTSEXEMPLARY (A RANGE) (18-20)
20 POINTSPRESENTED THE EVALUATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.Student did not submit assignment.Lack of evaluation of the implementation plan.Evaluation does not address all interventions.Evaluation of implementation does not discuss effectiveness.Evaluation addresses all interventions and effectiveness.CriteriaNO SUBMISSION
0 POINTSEMERGING (F THROUGH D RANGE) (12-14)
14 POINTSSATISFACTORY (C RANGE) (14-16)
16 POINTSPROFICIENT (B RANGE) (16-18)
18 POINTSEXEMPLARY (A RANGE) (18-20)
20 POINTSDESCRIBED PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERVENTIONSStudent did not submit assignment.Lack of a discussion about implementation.Included a vague discussion of the implementation.Provided description of the plan for the implementation of interventions.Thoroughly described the plan for implementation of interventions and anticipated signs of success.CriteriaNO SUBMISSION
0 POINTSEMERGING (F THROUGH D RANGE) (7-8)
8 POINTSSATISFACTORY (C RANGE) (8-9)
9 POINTSPROFICIENT (B RANGE) (10-11)
11 POINTSEXEMPLARY (A RANGE) (11-12)
12 POINTSCITED AT LEAST TWO JOURNAL ARTICLES AS REFERENCES FOR IDEAS IN THE WORK.Student did not submit assignment.Cited one source and it was not a journal article.Cited two sources but they were not journal articles.Cited one source that was a journal article.Cited two journal articles.CriteriaNO SUBMISSION
0 POINTSEMERGING (F THROUGH D RANGE) (31-36)
36 POINTSSATISFACTORY (C RANGE) (36-41)
41 POINTSPROFICIENT (B RANGE) (42-46)
46 POINTSEXEMPLARY (A RANGE) (47-52)
52 POINTSSUBMITTED THE COMPLETE DOCUMENTATION OF THE CAPSTONE PROJECT INCLUDING A DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF THE AGGREGATE, AND A COMPREHENSIVE CARE PLAN BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT.Student did not submit assignment.No documentation submitted.Submitted an incomplete documentation.Submitted a complete documentation.Submitted a complete and clear documentation.CriteriaNO SUBMISSION
0 POINTSEMERGING (F THROUGH D RANGE) (19-22)
22 POINTSSATISFACTORY (C RANGE) (22-25)
25 POINTSPROFICIENT (B RANGE) (26-28)
28 POINTSEXEMPLARY (A RANGE) (29-32)
32 POINTSPRESENTATION HIGHLIGHTED THE MAIN ASPECTS OF THE CAPSTONE PROJECT, SUCH AS A DESCRIPTION OF THE AGGREGATE, THE RESULTS OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT, THE MAJOR HEALTH RISKS, A SUMMARY OF THE STRATEGIES INCLUDED IN THE CARE PLAN, THE DETAILS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION,Student did not submit assignment.No presentation submitted.Submitted an incomplete presentation.Submitted a complete presentation.Submitted a complete and clear presentation.CriteriaNO SUBMISSION
0 POINTSEMERGING (F THROUGH D RANGE) (14-17)
17 POINTSSATISFACTORY (C RANGE) (17-19)
19 POINTSPROFICIENT (B RANGE) (19-21)
21 POINTSEXEMPLARY (A RANGE) (22-24)
24 POINTSPRESENTATION INCLUDED THE KEY LEARNING FROM THE CAPSTONE PROJECT.Student did not submit assignment.No key learning provided.Provided at least one key learning, clearly related to the project.Provided more than one key learning but not all are clearly related to the project.Provided more than one key learning and all are clearly related to the project.CriteriaNO SUBMISSION
0 POINTSEMERGING (F THROUGH D RANGE) (10-11)
11 POINTSSATISFACTORY (C RANGE) (11-13)
13 POINTSPROFICIENT (B RANGE) (13-14)
14 POINTSEXEMPLARY (A RANGE) (14-16)
16 POINTSORGANIZATION INTRODUCTION THESIS TRANSITIONS CONCLUSIONStudent did not submit assignment.Introduction is limited or missing entirely.The paper lacks a thesis statement.Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.The paper is loosely organized around a thesis that may have to be inferred.Transitions are sporadic.Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped.Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic.The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement.Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background info, and clearly states the topic.The paper is well organized around an arguable, focused thesis.Thoughtful transitions clearly show how ideas relate.Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.CriteriaNO SUBMISSION
0 POINTSEMERGING (F THROUGH D RANGE) (7-8)
8 POINTSSATISFACTORY (C RANGE) (8-9)
9 POINTSPROFICIENT (B RANGE) (10-11)
11 POINTSEXEMPLARY (A RANGE) (11-12)
12 POINTSUSAGE AND MECHANICS GRAMMAR SPELLING SENTENCE STRUCTUREStudent did not submit assignment.Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension.Errors in spelling and grammar exist that somewhat interfere with readability and/or comprehension.Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension.The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic.CriteriaNO SUBMISSION
0 POINTSEMERGING (F THROUGH D RANGE) (7-8)
8 POINTSSATISFACTORY (C RANGE) (8-9)
9 POINTSPROFICIENT (B RANGE) (10-11)
11 POINTSEXEMPLARY (A RANGE) (11-12)
12 POINTSAPA ELEMENTS ATTRIBUTION PARAPHRASING QUOTATIONSStudent did not submit assignment.No attempt at APA format.APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant.Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat minor.Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called for. Only a few minor errors present.Overall ScoreNO SUBMISSION
0 OR MOREEMERGING (F THROUGH D RANGE)
138 OR MORESATISFACTORY (C RANGE)
157 OR MOREPROFICIENT (B RANGE)
178 OR MOREEXEMPLARY (A RANGE)
200 OR MORE

one month ago

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.